Shooting the messenger

30 03 2007

Does anyone else think that where a violent dog attacks a small child we always make the wrong decision and destroy the animal? The ease with which one owner volunteered his dog to be put down suggests no real genuine responsibility on the owner’s part. Yes, it’s sad that a 12-year old had his face ripped off (although what sort of idiot approaches an unfamiliar dog?) but I fail to see how the dog is to blame. If you own a violent dog, and the dog attacks someone, how the hell is that the dog’s fault? It’s the owner’s fault for being an imbecile. No, I don’t think we should destroy the dogs at all, after all, they’re acting on a natural instinct. I think it makes much more sense to destroy the irresponsible owners. We could do with a cull of stupid people.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: